RFR: JDK-8038500: (zipfs) Upgrade ZIP provider to be a supported provider
xueming.shen at oracle.com
Mon Apr 14 19:15:16 UTC 2014
On 4/14/14 11:56 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 14/04/2014 18:52, Xueming Shen wrote:
>> Thanks Mandy and Alan for the review.
>> webrev has been updated accordingly to
>> (1) Removed the basic.sh. The tests are now using test.jdk to access
>> the zipfs.jar directly
>> (2) Updated most of the class to package package, only
>> ZipFileSystemProvider (the spi interface)
>> and ZipInfo are public.
>> The ZipInfo is a handy utility sometime I find it useful to
>> simply do java com.sun.nio.zipfs.Info xyz.zip
>> to display all cen and loc tables in details. I may take
>> sometime to find a better home for it later.
>> (3) I have not migrated the test target zipfs.jar to an "independent"
>> test source (created during test) yet,
>> will definitely later in a separate thread when we move to modules.
>> (4) Yes, I mean to keep Demo there as an interactive regression test.
> Iris asked me off-list about the name space which makes me wonder if
> we should use the opportunity to move this to jdk.<something>. As it's
> a service provider then nothing should be accessing these classes
> directly. The only thing that comes to mind is
> ZipFileAttributeView/ZipFileAttributes where the API provides a
> type-safe means to access attributes. In the webrev then these are
> being changed to package-private so I think would break anyone that
> might be using them anyway.
go with jdk.nio.zipfs? I'm fine with that if this is the new directory
to go. though it appears we have 1000+ classes at com.sun...
More information about the core-libs-dev