RFR(XS): 8032678: [TESTBUG] sun/misc/Version/Version.java doesn't understand two-digit HotSpot minor version numbers

Joseph Darcy joe.darcy at oracle.com
Fri Jan 24 18:47:54 UTC 2014

I've removed the incorrect-for-JBS multiple release values of "8-pool, 
9" in the fixVersion field of the main bug record.


On 1/24/2014 10:39 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
> I've just pushed this to jdk9/dev.
> I also received an email stating that "this bug needs to be updated,
> please request to defer or upgrade to P1 and request for approval". I
> assume that's because I entered "8-pool, 9" as "Fix versions".
> Now I actually don't know what to do. It seems strange to upgrade this
> to P1 because it is only a test bug. On the other hand it is needed in
> 8u because there's where we have the trouble.
> So should I upgrade it to P1 and request approval for jdk8u-dev (or
> directly jdk8u)? The actual problem occurs in jdk8u only, because
> jdk8u-dev doesn't yet has change 8032678 which bumps the HS minor
> number to 20.
> Can I push directly to jdk8u or does the change has to go trough jdk8u-dev?
> Thanks,
> Volker
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Vladimir Kozlov
> <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
>> Good change. I got this failure too.
>> Thanks,
>> Vladimir
>> On 1/24/14 9:04 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> could you please review the following trivial change:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/8032678/
>>> which fixes the JDK test jdk/test/sun/misc/Version/Version.java to
>>> correctly handle two-digit HotSpot minor version numbers. This became
>>> necessary after change "8031552: Update the Hotspot version numbers in
>>> Hotspot for JDK 8U" bumped the minor HS version to '20' in jdk8u.
>>> This webrev is for jdk9 but it will have to be backported to jdk8u
>>> because there’s where the current problem happens.
>>> Thanks,
>>> Volker

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list