RFR 9: 8064932: test java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java: waitFor didn't take long enough
martinrb at google.com
Fri Nov 14 19:57:19 UTC 2014
This sort of change may be a necessary concession to reality, but
before we go there ... as I said in a previous review, this test may
demonstrate a real bug in the jdk implementation. Is this
system-dependent? Is it easy to reproduce? Can we fix the JDK?
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:48 AM, roger riggs <roger.riggs at oracle.com> wrote:
> Please review this test change to make the wait time in ProcessBuilder/Basic
> a bit more lenient.
> 8064932: java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java: waitFor didn't take long
> Thanks, Roger
More information about the core-libs-dev