Losing features of JVM_Open, e.g. CLOEXEC

David Holmes david.holmes at oracle.com
Thu Oct 30 09:45:34 UTC 2014

On 30/10/2014 6:46 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 29/10/2014 21:15, Mario Torre wrote:
>> +1
>> We should have spotted it in the review though.
> We should but the ultimate rat catcher should be the tests, it's
> possible that we have a hole there.

Not sure how the presence or absence of CLOEXEC would be visible to any 
test - especially given all the other uses of raw open in the JDK sources.


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list