RFR 8068730: Increase the precision of the implementation of java.time.Clock.systemUTC()
daniel.fuchs at oracle.com
Tue Jan 13 09:53:58 UTC 2015
On 13/01/15 04:52, David Holmes wrote:
>> Here is the new webrev with Stephen & your feedback included
>> (windows_time_stamp not renamed yet)
> I checked the updated webrev.02 and everything looks good on the hotspot
> What are your plans for pushing this?
My understanding is that I'll need to push that through hs-rt - since
it has changes for hotspot. I believe I'll need two reviewers - is that
right? Roger Riggs has also reviewed the changes on core-libs-dev, so
is this good to go, or do both reviewers need to be members of the hsx
Also - I am not sure whether I need a sponsor (I have never pushed
anything to hs-rt - I usually push in jdk9-dev) or whether I am
allowed to push this myself (I'll use jprt in that case).
More information about the core-libs-dev