RFR 8068730: Increase the precision of the implementation of java.time.Clock.systemUTC()
david.holmes at oracle.com
Tue Jan 13 12:26:39 UTC 2015
On 13/01/2015 7:53 PM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> On 13/01/15 04:52, David Holmes wrote:
>>> Here is the new webrev with Stephen & your feedback included
>>> (windows_time_stamp not renamed yet)
>> I checked the updated webrev.02 and everything looks good on the hotspot
>> What are your plans for pushing this?
> Thanks David,
> My understanding is that I'll need to push that through hs-rt - since
> it has changes for hotspot. I believe I'll need two reviewers - is that
> right? Roger Riggs has also reviewed the changes on core-libs-dev, so
> is this good to go, or do both reviewers need to be members of the hsx
hsx project is defunct, so technically we're all just jdk9 reviewers,
but we still like two reviews from hotspot team members.
> Also - I am not sure whether I need a sponsor (I have never pushed
> anything to hs-rt - I usually push in jdk9-dev) or whether I am
> allowed to push this myself (I'll use jprt in that case).
If you are a jdk9 committer then you can push yourself via jprt - full
forest submission from top-level: "jprt submit -forest -testset hotspot"
> best regards,
> -- daniel
More information about the core-libs-dev