Review request : JDK-6933879: URISyntaxException when non-alphanumeric characters are present in scope_id
konstantin.shefov at oracle.com
Fri Jan 16 12:50:02 UTC 2015
Hi Chris, Alan, thank you for reviewing.
I have made a new webrev
I have removed ":" and added a test case.
16.01.2015 14:42, Chris Hegarty пишет:
> On 16/01/15 11:29, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> On 16/01/2015 10:49, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>> I don't see any reason to update the spec here, given that the set of
>>> allowable character is not clearly defined in the relevant RFC's.
>> I think we need to create a bug to look into this more. Inet6Address
>> allows the scope of be any String but URI puts restrictions on what is
>> legal. The proposed change updates the list of allowed characters but I
>> assume it will need to re-visited again as systems with more exotic
>> interface names are encountered.
> Yes that is possible, but to date this is the first time I've seen
> this come up.
> Given the lack of clear specification in the relevant RFC's (relating
> to scope ids ), I don't think we should be making too many
> specification changes in this area. But I agree with your comment, URI
> has a restriction that it not clearly specified in the Java spec.
More information about the core-libs-dev