RFR: jsr166 jdk9 integration wave 2
aleksey.shipilev at oracle.com
Mon Nov 16 22:42:25 UTC 2015
On 11/17/2015 12:39 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
jtregTests/: Glanced over it, seem OK
* I think this one requires CCC, because it changes public API in
* Are those tracing statements ("// trace("barrier action",
startTime);") kept for a reason? Should we conditionalize them with
"static final boolean"-s?
* Should we use Runtime.availableProcessors() instead of 8?
> The primary focus is making jtreg tests more robust and faster.
> It also contains the changes to j.u.c.atomic that Aleksey is waiting for.
Yes! Thank you. If you push everything in one batch, please split that
one ("atomic/") out to ease backporting to 8u.
More information about the core-libs-dev