RFR: 8140344: add support for 3 digit update release numbers
david.holmes at oracle.com
Wed Nov 18 09:00:56 UTC 2015
On 18/11/2015 1:30 AM, Rob McKenna wrote:
> I'd expect this to be superseded by 223 completely but I've cc'd
> verona-dev in case there are objections. At this point the fix is more
> for the benefit of 7 & 8. I'd be happy to mark this 9-na if that makes
> more sense?
I'd vote for a 7 (and 8?) specific fix. Didn't this already get fixed in 6.
> On 17/11/15 15:19, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> On 17/11/2015 14:47, Rob McKenna wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>> With 7u hitting 101 shortly we've noticed that our Version parsing
>>> infrastructure balks at the extra digit. With that in mind I'd like to
>>> update the logic surrounding the parsing of version numbers and the
>>> test itself to use regex instead of the less flexible
>>> CharacterSequence method.
>> Would it be better to bring this to verona-dev so that this can be
>> looked at in the context of the JEP 223 changes?
More information about the core-libs-dev