RFR: 8140344: add support for 3 digit update release numbers
rob.mckenna at oracle.com
Mon Nov 23 14:24:23 UTC 2015
Thanks David, I'll mark this 9-na. (bcc'ing verona-dev)
Something similar was fixed in 7
(https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8009634) - that may be what
you're thinking of.
Aside from that are you ok with the changes?
On 18/11/15 09:00, David Holmes wrote:
> On 18/11/2015 1:30 AM, Rob McKenna wrote:
>> I'd expect this to be superseded by 223 completely but I've cc'd
>> verona-dev in case there are objections. At this point the fix is more
>> for the benefit of 7 & 8. I'd be happy to mark this 9-na if that makes
>> more sense?
> I'd vote for a 7 (and 8?) specific fix. Didn't this already get fixed in 6.
>> On 17/11/15 15:19, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> On 17/11/2015 14:47, Rob McKenna wrote:
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>> With 7u hitting 101 shortly we've noticed that our Version parsing
>>>> infrastructure balks at the extra digit. With that in mind I'd like to
>>>> update the logic surrounding the parsing of version numbers and the
>>>> test itself to use regex instead of the less flexible
>>>> CharacterSequence method.
>>> Would it be better to bring this to verona-dev so that this can be
>>> looked at in the context of the JEP 223 changes?
More information about the core-libs-dev