RFR: jsr166 jdk9 integration wave 6

Remi Forax forax at univ-mlv.fr
Sun Apr 3 19:34:33 UTC 2016

Hi Martin,
for http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk9/jsr166-jdk9-integration/miscellaneous/

aka introducing a new constructor seems to be a regression to me,
the less overloads we have the better i understand the code.


----- Mail original -----
> De: "Martin Buchholz" <martinrb at google.com>
> À: "core-libs-dev" <core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net>, "Doug Lea" <dl at cs.oswego.edu>, "Paul Sandoz"
> <paul.sandoz at oracle.com>, "Chris Hegarty" <chris.hegarty at oracle.com>, "David Holmes" <David.Holmes at oracle.com>
> Envoyé: Dimanche 3 Avril 2016 20:29:57
> Objet: RFR: jsr166 jdk9 integration wave 6
> Easy changes to review, up to April Fools day, in part to make room
> for later unfinished more exciting changes.
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk9/jsr166-jdk9-integration/

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list