RFR(XXS): 8149519: Investigate implementation of java.specification.version
Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Wed Apr 27 12:16:27 UTC 2016
On 27/04/2016 12:26, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> I think the jdk9 docs have moved (again, grrrr - I complain about this
> sort of thing every release) and so a google search for "package class
> se 9" only finds the old one +104 at
> Why can't there be a redirect instead of leaving the old docs in place?
Yeah, a number of us noticed that recently too. Chasing the folks that
publish these builds to get this fixed ...
More information about the core-libs-dev