potential error in fdlibm asin
aph at redhat.com
Mon Dec 5 10:10:20 UTC 2016
On 02/12/16 14:24, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> I found one copy of this code in the internet where the "else" is removed,
> but it's not completely the same:
> Does anybody have the knowledge to tell me what's wrong?
> Does anybody know how to contribute a fix to netlib fdlibm?
I think the only way to proceed with this is to find an input argument
which is affected by this very odd code. If there is one. does it
give a correct or an incorrect result? If not, we don't care and it
can be tidied up later.
More information about the core-libs-dev