RFR 8171988: backout of 8062389, 8029459, 8061950
chris.hegarty at oracle.com
Mon Dec 26 09:58:49 UTC 2016
> On 26 Dec 2016, at 09:35, Peter Levart <peter.levart at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> I've been told that the latest change I pushed causes some tests to fail, so I prepared a backout patch for 8062389, 8029459, 8061950:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~plevart/jdk9-dev/Class.getMethods.new/backout.09/webrev.01/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~plevart/jdk9-dev/Class.getMethods.new/backout.09/webrev.01/>
I just grabbed the webrev patch, applied it to a local repo, then
compared that against a repo that had been updated to the
change prior to your push. They are identical, so this appears
to be an accurate anti-delta.
Maybe file a new bug, or just make it clear in the synopsis of
8171988 that it is an anti-delta.
> From the stacktrace of the bug report, it seems an early initialization issue with VarHandle(s) involved. Can you shed some light into what tests are failing?
I’ll post a few comments in 8171988 with sample failures.
> But first let us backout that change.
> Regards, Peter
> On 12/26/2016 10:09 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
>> Hi Jeff,
>> I'm taking a look at this...
>> Regards, Peter
>> On 12/26/2016 06:14 AM, Jeff Dinkins wrote:
>>> Hi Peter -
>>> I just received mail from out SQE manager, saying that your last changeset has caused our test harness to hiccup. I don’t have much more detail besides the below bug, but I’m wondering if you could do us a huge favor and roll your change back for now while it’s debugged (and so we can get our automated tests going again).
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171988 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171988>
More information about the core-libs-dev