RFR: 8072379: Implement jdk.Version and jdk.OracleVersion
iris.clark at oracle.com
Wed Feb 3 17:48:57 UTC 2016
> Good to have this in but now we need to decide on where it
> should live. It's JDK-specific so we'll need it exported
> by a JDK module rather than java.base.
8144062 was next on my list.
Do you have any suggestions for the module?
Of the existing modules in the jdk repository, jdk.dev seems
to have the most appropriate name. It appears to only contain
jimage so I'm not sure about that module's charter.
From: Alan Bateman
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 12:53 AM
To: Iris Clark; Mandy Chung
Cc: verona-dev at openjdk.java.net; core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: RFR: 8072379: Implement jdk.Version and jdk.OracleVersion
On 03/02/2016 03:17, Iris Clark wrote:
> Hi, Mandy.
> Thanks so much for pushing the changeset for the initial
> implementation of jdk.Version!
Good to have this in but now we need to decide on where it should live.
It's JDK-specific so we'll need it exported by a JDK module rather than java.base.
More information about the core-libs-dev