JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8151763; Use more informative format for problem list
Joseph D. Darcy
joe.darcy at oracle.com
Wed Mar 16 23:52:01 UTC 2016
Noted; I'll make that improvement in the next round.
Thanks for pointing this out,
On 3/16/2016 4:50 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> On 03/11/2016 07:28 PM, joe darcy wrote:
>> As Jon Gibbons has noted off-list, the problem list entries can
>> directly include the bug number associated with the test in question,
>> enabling better reporting. This format should be used rather than the
>> current convention of putting the bug number in a comment.
>> Please review the webrev to adopt the revised format for the problem
>> I've verified jtreg produces the same test list with the old and new
>> versions of the problem list.
> You can use a comma-separated list when multiple bugs are involved.
> The only restriction is, no embedded whitespace within the list
> 342 # Also 8080165
> 343 java/util/Arrays/ParallelPrefix.java 8085982 generic-all
> can be
> 343 java/util/Arrays/ParallelPrefix.java 8085982,8080165 generic-all
> -- Jon
More information about the core-libs-dev