JAXP default implementation and JDK-8152063
Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Tue Mar 29 10:36:08 UTC 2016
On 29/03/2016 10:55, Andrew Haley wrote:
> I'm sure that's right. However, we are also running the risk of
> breaking important use cases when JDK9 is released. We're going to
> have to do a lot of work with developers to make sure that they can
> still work with JDK9. The problem is that many developers do not even
> try to run with a new JDK until that JDK is released. So, we have to
> make sure that we have enough escape hatches.
In this case, then -XaddExports should work as an escape hatch if really
In the mean-time then we can see if there is way forward on this that
doesn't introduce security or memory leak concerns.
More information about the core-libs-dev