RFR(M) 8182701: Modify JVMCI to allow Graal Compiler to expose platform MBean
vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com
Thu Aug 17 18:54:34 UTC 2017
What we should do with 8182701? Do you still need JVMCI changes?
Note, your changes to Graal [GR-5435] were integrated recently into JDK (jdk10/hs):
On 8/14/17 10:06 AM, Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
> On čtvrtek 3. srpna 2017 17:03:39 CEST Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
>> On čtvrtek 27. července 2017 15:01:17 CEST Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> On 27/07/2017 10:07, Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
>>>> Yes, it seems like a desirable goal to let Graal compiler work with just
>>>> java.base. Is there a description how to build JDK9/10 with just
>>>> that I could follow and test against?
>>> You can use jlink to create a run-time image that only contains
>>> java.base (jlink --module-path $JAVA_HOME/jmods --add-modules java.base
>>> --output smalljre).
>> Status update: I've just tried to run Graal compiler against JDK9 with only
>> java.base and jdk.internal.vm.ci modules, and there are some problems. I
>> need to resolve them first before I provide updated version of my patch.
> FYI: As of
> the Graal compiler can run with java.base, jdk.unsupported and jdk.vm.ci only
> modules. But it wasn't easy, especially the http://wiki.apidesign.org/wiki/PropertyChangeListener required a bit of work.
More information about the core-libs-dev