FW: RFR(M): 8189102: All tools should support -?, -h and --help
goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com
Mon Dec 18 17:35:08 UTC 2017
I had to update my webrev after the javah launcher had been removed:
I would appreciate a final decision to push this.
From: serviceability-dev [mailto:serviceability-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Lindenmaier, Goetz
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 11:37 AM
To: Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com>; core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net; 'compiler-dev at openjdk.java.net' <compiler-dev at openjdk.java.net>; serviceability-dev (serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net) <serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net>
Subject: RE: FW: RFR(M): 8189102: All tools should support -?, -h and --help
Javadoc combines documentation and support of a flag in the
way the flag handling is implemented. On the other side,
it prints the help message anyways if a wrong flag is presented
to it, so if you call it with -help you get the help message.
Therefore, in my original change where I tried to get it
more cleaned up, I removed -help support and documentation
I added it again and updated the table in the CSR:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Bateman [mailto:Alan.Bateman at oracle.com]
> Sent: Montag, 11. Dezember 2017 17:53
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>; core-libs-
> dev at openjdk.java.net; 'compiler-dev at openjdk.java.net' <compiler-
> dev at openjdk.java.net>; serviceability-dev (serviceability-
> dev at openjdk.java.net) <serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> Subject: Re: FW: RFR(M): 8189102: All tools should support -?, -h and --help
> On 07/12/2017 11:20, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> > Hi,
> > ... missed some lists in my first post ...
> > I prepared a fifth webrev for this change. Please review.
> > It incorporates the changes requested by the CSR reviewers
> > (not to remove docuemtation of '-help' where is was documented
> > before) and the changes proposed by Kumar:
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr17/8189102-
> Looks like it still drops -help from the javadoc usage message, I can't
> tell if you meant to do that.
More information about the core-libs-dev