vitalyd at gmail.com
Thu Jul 13 19:35:38 UTC 2017
Similarly, I've used
in these circumstances.
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:29 PM Maurizio Cimadamore <
maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com> wrote:
> Maybe automatic refactoring to Map.Entry ? With the new static method
> added in 9, creating one is also very fluent (but I know that Entry
> doesn't convey same meaning as Pair in method signatures/fields)
> On 13/07/17 18:22, joe darcy wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> > See the discussion in thread:
> > In short, no current plans to add java.util.Pair.
> > -Joe
> > On 7/13/2017 10:07 AM, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
> >> See the ancient https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-4947273.
> >> At Amazon, many projects depend on JavaFX to get only a single class,
> >> namely javafx.util.Pair. That means that we must distribute OpenJFX
> >> along with our internal OpenJDK distribution, or split
> >> javafx.util.Pair out into a separate package, both of which we’d like
> >> to avoid in the future. So, are there any plans to add java.util.Pair
> >> to JDK10?
> >> Thanks,
> >> Paul
Sent from my phone
More information about the core-libs-dev