RFR: jsr166 jdk? integration wave ?
martinrb at google.com
Fri Mar 3 19:43:54 UTC 2017
Changes except for ThreadPoolExecutor.java submitted.
ThreadPoolExecutor doc change is deferred to jdk10.
We have a new change, to SubmissionPublisher, which should probably make
jdk9 because SubmissionPublisher is new to jdk9.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Martin Buchholz <martinrb at google.com>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:59 AM, Chris Hegarty <chris.hegarty at oracle.com>
>> > On 22 Feb 2017, at 20:30, Martin Buchholz <martinrb at google.com> wrote:
>> > We half promised "no more jdk9 changes", but ...
>> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk9/jsr166-
>> > as usual, I think they should go into jdk9, but y'all probably tell me
>> > too late (and that's OK; we can retarget for jdk10)
>> Are there any spec changes, or all rewordings that do not affect spec
>> (there’s quite a bit of noise in the webrevs )?
> There's only the "spec change" in ThreadPoolExecutor.java. I don't count
> that as a "real" spec change, because the original intent is clear enough,
> but you might disagree.
More information about the core-libs-dev