RFR: jsr166 jdk10 integration wave 6
dl at cs.oswego.edu
Wed Nov 29 21:39:38 UTC 2017
On 11/29/2017 01:43 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> 1004 // Order-sensitive field declarations
> Is this still relevant
Not really; layout is now discussed in class-level doc.
> 81 * <p>A single SubmissionPublisher may be shared among multiple
> 82 * sources. Actions in a source thread prior to publishing an item or
> 83 * issuing a signal <a href="package-summary.html#MemoryVisibility">
> 84 * <i>happen-before</i></a> actions subsequent to the corresponding
> 85 * access by each subscriber. But reported estimates of lag and demand
> 86 * are designed for use in monitoring, not for synchronization
> 87 * control, and may reflect stale or inaccurate views of progress.
> We probably need a CSR for this.
Yeah, I guess so, even though it is just a clarification.
> Is “corresponding access by each subscriber” referring to access of the
> published item by each subscriber?
Yes. And also for signals like closeExceptionally exceptions.
This seems to cover both cases, but maybe could be improved.
More information about the core-libs-dev