[PATCH] JDK-8214122 Prevent name mangling of jdwpTransport_OnLoad in Windows 32-bit DLL name decoration

Alexey Ivanov alexey.ivanov at oracle.com
Wed Dec 12 16:14:48 UTC 2018

Forgot to add the link:

On 12/12/2018 16:10, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> Ali has scanned the code base, he says, “couldn’t find (hopefully tbh) 
> other occurrences of such mismatches.”


> On 10/12/2018 10:45, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> It might be worthwhile to scan the entire code base for JNICALL and 
>> verify that we have no more mismatches. In general, JNICALL should be 
>> preserved on all officially supported, exported interfaces. It need 
>> not be present on interfaces used only internally, and my current 
>> thinking is that it would be better if it were removed on all 
>> internal interfaces. But at the very least, it should be consistently 
>> specificed where exported and imported. (Any misses here is probably 
>> due to duplicate declarations, instead of properly including header 
>> files, so that's the correct way to resolve any problems found...)


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list