[JDK 11] RFR: 8195096: Exception printed on console with custom LogManager on starting Apache Tomcat
daniel.fuchs at oracle.com
Tue Jan 23 10:49:23 UTC 2018
Thanks for looking into this.
On 22/01/2018 23:52, mandy chung wrote:
> So the cause of JDK-8191033 is because cx::addLocalLogger returns false
> when addLogger is called the first time to add the root and global
> logger and it causes that ".handlers" is not read and loaded for the
> root logger.
Yes. "global" suffers the same fate.
> It took me some time to understand what it's happening.
> When addLocalLogger is called to add a logger, it calls
> ensureAllDefaultLoggers to ensure the root and global loggers are added
> first. Do you think the handling of ".handlers" should be done in
> LoggerContext::ensureDefaultLogger? Would that avoid the check to call
> loadLoggerHandlers if it's called from ensureLogManagerInitialized?
> The code is getting quite complicated and if moving it closer to the
> place it adds the root logger would help.
I did give it some consideration. I think this would be a mistake.
The whole point of this fix is that loadLoggerHandlers *must* be
called *within* addLogger - so that a subclass of LogManager that
overrides addLogger can take over.
The fact that loadLoggerHandlers was called outside of
addLogger was what caused the issue with ClassLoaderLogMaanger.
In 10 we see that the root logger is added to the context outside
of the call to addLogger, so doing what you suggest would - I
think - trigger the issue again.
In addition the lazy code that ensure that the root and global
loggers are added first to the contexts is complex enough - I
would be very reluctant to fiddle too much with it.
The condition in the / else if / can be true only once
when addLogger is called after reading the primordial
configuration - so I believe the fix is sound.
The other possibility would be to manage a state for the creation
of handlers (from name + ".handlers") for both root & global, but
I believe this would be more complicated.
> On 1/22/18 8:47 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
More information about the core-libs-dev