RFR  8207846: Generalize the jdk.net.includeInExceptions security property
sean.mullan at oracle.com
Fri Jul 20 17:07:51 UTC 2018
On 7/20/18 11:08 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> This is ambiguous, and needs to be clarified. Surely, it is
> better to use the same wording as the serial filter:
> "Whitespace is significant and is considered part of the value."
Kind of on the fence on that one. If this were a general property/value
format, I would agree, but these values are fixed and not potentially
For example, does this mean:
are different? And I assume the latter " jarInfo" would be ignored?
If you are strongly in favor of this, I would highly recommend logging a
warning when there is an unknown value, otherwise typos and such would
be hard to detect (although this doesn't necessarily need to be in the
More information about the core-libs-dev