RFR: Here are some Thread cleanup patches
david.holmes at oracle.com
Tue Mar 27 23:42:24 UTC 2018
On 28/03/2018 4:28 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> The usual story when I change Thread.java is that I'm missing something and
> I end up reverting, so I was extra careful this time.
> 8200122: Remove unused field Thread.threadQ
> 8200123: Replace Thread.init with telescoping constructor
Looks fine - for some reason I thought we had a direct VM call to init()
but we don't.
What is the effect of @stable? I'm just thinking about any possible
impact on initialization order.
More information about the core-libs-dev