RFR: 8207851 JEP Draft: Support ByteBuffer mapped over non-volatile memory
Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Wed Oct 3 14:24:30 UTC 2018
On 03/10/2018 10:14, Andrew Dinn wrote:
> Sure, I'd be happy to change this.
> Would READ_ONLY_SYNC and READ_WRITE_SYNC be suitable alternatives? Or do
> you have something else in mind?
I think that works but it means looking at the proposed
MappedByteBuffer::isPersistent too. MappedByteBuffer hasn't needed
methods to test if the mapping is read-only, read-write or private
mapping and I wonder if isPersistent is really needed.
More information about the core-libs-dev