RFR: 8215303: Allowing additional currency code points from later Unicode updates
naoto.sato at oracle.com
Mon Jan 7 16:26:12 UTC 2019
On 1/7/19 2:11 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> On 5 Jan 2019, at 17:03, Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com> wrote:
>> On 04/01/2019 17:18, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>> Will compilations with `--release N-1` wind back the set of allowable
>>> identifiers? It possibly should, if so how does one do similar when/if
>>> the set of currency characters is expanded in an update release?
>> I don't think `javac --release` takes the Unicode version into account.
> That is a bug.
>> I agree with your comment that the CSR could be be expanded to at least make it clear that if support for a currency symbol is added in some future update of JDK N then source code using it in identifiers will compile with the JDK update that supports the symbol, not by the GA or previous updates of JDK N.
> The question is whether, or not, it is reasonable to allow ( part of )
> the set of Java identifiers, in the language, to be an implementation
> detail? If so, then certain code compiled and run on BuzzCorps Java
> implementation may not compile or run on WollyInc's Java implementation.
> ( Both are compliant Java SE implementations )
> I accept that the set of implementation specific currency characters
> may noy be all that large, but this does seem like a significant
> change, and I want to ensure that the implications are fully understood.
Agree. It's good to have more insights here. I will need to wait for
someone more appropriate to answer to this question.
More information about the core-libs-dev