RFR: JDK-8216558: Lookup.unreflectSetter(Field) fails to throw IllegalAccessException for final fields
mandy.chung at oracle.com
Fri Mar 22 16:56:12 UTC 2019
On 3/22/19 8:40 AM, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Please update distinct versions of a webrev (e.g. distinguished with
> .1, .2 directory names) rather than overwriting a single one. This
> make it easier for those coming to the review thread later to see the
> evolution of the changes over time.
I had requested new test in the webrev during my review. That really
helps me, a reviewer, to keep track what has been changed easily. It
will also give you an idea how many revisions this review involves when
you started for a code review (as opposed to asking for "how to fix this
I was asked to read the regression test that is attached to JBS issue 
I was asked to review a diff (cut-n-paste) on the mail when I requested
a webrev to include a regression test. 
On Jan 31, 2019 , I includeed a link to the OpenJDK developer guide
and I was hoping you read the guideline and be familiar with it which
should help you contributing to the OpenJDK.
I was disappointed to get your conclusion:
> Historically, the bigger the change I propose, the more months it takes
> the OpenJDK community to approve.
I had helped as much as I can to sponsor this patch even if you refused
what I requested to help my review easier.
I expected that you ran JDK regression tests on local machine rather
than I caught it for you. Is that what you expected a reviewer to do it
for you? Won't you consider this a new revision to your patch? You
can do anything you like and tells a reviewer that I should be smart
enough to identify the diff in the previous patch. I am not an educator
and excuse me if my response is not what you are looking for.
More information about the core-libs-dev