RFR 8241073: Pre-generated Stubs for javax.management, Activation, Naming

Roger Riggs roger.riggs at oracle.com
Thu Mar 19 15:14:07 UTC 2020

Hi Alan,

The mismatches are due to the combination of generated Stub and old stub 
I'll clean it up a bit before pushing.  As pretty static code it didn't 
seem worth much investment.

Thanks, Roger

On 3/19/20 3:39 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 18/03/2020 21:24, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Some small updates to the source files to minimize the changes to 
>> javadoc
>> of the _Stub classes.
> All looks good but the updated ActivationGroup_Stub should probably 
> get a one-pass to eliminate the inconsistencies, e.g. the new version 
> imports some java.rmi.* classes but uses qualified class names in 
> several places. There is unusual formatting in several places, e.g. 
> L90/91. So just nits but since the entire line is changed then maybe 
> run get the IDE to tidy it up before pushing.
> -Alan

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list