[11u] RFR(S): 8223326: Regression introduced by CPU sync: java.security.AccessControlException: access denied ("java.net.NetPermission" "setSocketImpl")
hohensee at amazon.com
Tue Mar 24 13:36:11 UTC 2020
Thanks for the explanation of the process.
On 3/23/20, 11:28 PM, "Langer, Christoph" <christoph.langer at sap.com> wrote:
as Martin said, the original bug could not be opened by Oracle. I, however changed the bug created by Martin to a Backport item. Doing it that way would allow a "standard" backport of such type of issues while the original item that was pushed to head can remain invisible. We proceeded like that with other bugs already and it proved to work nicely.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: core-libs-dev <core-libs-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net> On Behalf
> Of Hohensee, Paul
> Sent: Montag, 23. März 2020 19:29
> To: Doerr, Martin <martin.doerr at sap.com>; core-libs-
> dev at openjdk.java.net; jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: RE: [11u] RFR(S): 8223326: Regression introduced by CPU sync:
> java.security.AccessControlException: access denied
> ("java.net.NetPermission" "setSocketImpl")
> The changeset references JDK-8223326, which is private. If possible, ask
> Oracle to make it public so we can do a normal backport rather than file an
> 11u-specific issue. The backport itself looks fine.
> On 3/23/20, 11:08 AM, "jdk-updates-dev on behalf of Doerr, Martin" <jdk-
> updates-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of
> martin.doerr at sap.com> wrote:
> I'd like to backport JDK-8223326 from jdk/jdk.
> 11u backport issue:
> Original change:
> 11u backport webrev:
> I had to integrate the change manually due to context changes. However,
> the new code fits to the 11u versions.
> Please review.
> Best regards,
More information about the core-libs-dev