doko at ubuntu.com
Fri Apr 18 15:20:28 PDT 2008
Thomas Viehmann schrieb:
> I'm afraid that openjdk-6 still needs some work:
thanks for looking into this. after the second try to upload and 10 days in the
NEW queue the review is a bit terse.
> Up to now I found:
> - The debian/copyright file seems to miss a lot of
> copyright notices (e.g. of Red Hat, Maxwell, ASF,
> I stopped after finding four). This is the main
> reject reason.
it would be helpful if you could mention those. it would be appreciated if you
could act proactively.
> - There are some files in the generated subdir that
> I'm not sure I found the source of. Could you
> clarify this a bit for me?
which files? Sorry, I really dislike rejecting a package for clarification
reasons. You can ask if you are unsure.
> - usr-share-doc-symlink-without-dependency
> is an explicit policy violation and not allowed.
please be specific. or this lintian not detecting indirect dependencies?
> While you're doing stuff, you could also get rid of
> - substvar-source-version-is-deprecated
thanks for the hint, but this doesn't belong into a reject message.
More information about the distro-pkg-dev