On ecj and @Override annotations for interface methods
mark at klomp.org
Fri Sep 19 03:53:25 PDT 2008
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 12:42 +0200, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Hmmm, that puts us in a somewhat awkward position then. Are there any
> > plans on a resolution to this issue of not having free specification
> > terms?
> I don't know whether the JCP has a way to retroactively change license
> terms of
> published specifications, assuming that's what you are wondering about.
What I wondering about is if whether Sun can publish this document under
terms that are acceptable to the community, so that getting access to
the document doesn't take away any rights of publishing an independent
or openjdk based implementation under the GPL without the restrictions
on scope that the current terms 2 (a - c) inflict upon us hackers.
More information about the distro-pkg-dev