What is the status of Zero on OpenJDK 7
mvfranz at gmail.com
Wed Nov 11 05:46:36 PST 2009
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Gary Benson <gbenson at redhat.com> wrote:
> Michael Franz wrote:
> > I was able to get past this by upgrading to llvm 2.6 (Fedora 11 as
> > 2.5). I see post referencing llvm 2.7. Is this going to be the
> > required version soon?
> There's no plans for that. In the past we've generally supported as
> many versions as developers cared about.
> > I am building on a G4 which is 32 bits, but _LP64=1 is being
> > defined. This is causing problems as jlong is being defined
> > incorrectly (long instead of long long). How do I unset _LP64?
> What does 'uname -m' say on your machine?
> uname -m
I was able to get the build to progress by setting ARCH_DATA_MODEL=32 before
calling make. I did this since there didn't seem to be a case where the
ARCH was equal to ppc and it then defaults to 64.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the distro-pkg-dev