RFC: Backport PR542 to icedtea6 1.9 and 1.8
Dr Andrew John Hughes
ahughes at redhat.com
Fri Mar 25 08:23:21 PDT 2011
On 09:42 Fri 25 Mar , Omair Majid wrote:
> On 03/24/2011 06:15 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> > I'm fine with the patch. I'm just confused by the motive.
> It's a rather simple backport for a bug that some users are hitting. It
> seemed simple enough to fix, so I just backported the fix. The main
> motive, (as stated in my first email) is
> > Why suddenly patch this? There's no imminent release of 1.8 or 1.9,
> > and I thought it had been agreed that the plugin + NetX implementation
> > in these versions would be disabled by default for the next release,
> > in favour of IcedTea-Web?
> I guess I missed that discussion.
So far, it's just an idea proposed by myself and agreed by Deepak to start
to push people off the unmaintained plugin and to IcedTea-Web. The patch
isn't out there yet.
> If there wont be a 1.8 or a 1.9
> release soon and we are disabling netx/plugin in those releases, then I
> might as well save myself the hassle of backporting.
I wasn't planning one before the security update by Oracle in June, unless
something (like a IcedTea-Web security issue) comes up.
It is up to you if you want to backport it. It seems both Deepak and I
have already approved the patches so you may as well push them now.
It just seemed to come a bit out of the blue, that's all.
> Still, disabled by default means people may actually attempt to build
> and use icedtea6 1.8/1.9 with netx/plugin.
Indeed. There aren't any plans to rip it out, just gently push people to
IcedTea-Web. Of course, 1.8 and 1.9 will die altogether eventually.
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and IcedTea
PGP Key: F5862A37 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EA30 D855 D50F 90CD F54D 0698 0713 C3ED F586 2A37
More information about the distro-pkg-dev