IcedTea build instructions
aph at redhat.com
Thu Oct 6 02:21:25 PDT 2011
On 10/06/2011 08:53 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> On 10/05/2011 05:13 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 10/05/2011 04:08 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>> http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/Main_Page sez:
>>>> hg clone -r icedtea6-1.10 http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/release/icedtea6-1.10
>>>> Surely this is wrong -- you really want
>>>> hg clone -r icedtea6-1.10.3 ssh://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/release/icedtea6-1.10
>> I meant http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/release/icedtea6-1.10
>>>> Don't you?
>>>> Or maybe even
>>>> hg clone http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/release/icedtea6-1.10
> I believe the last one is the most correct. The first is also correct.
How is the first one correct? It's an old release on the
> But hg clone -r icedtea6-1.10.3 http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/release/icedtea6-1.10 is not correct
> for sure. As far as I know there is no branching on
> minor-minor-vrsions - and have no sense.
I'm not sure what you mean by this. icedtea6-1.10.3 is the most
recent release tag.
> X.Y.Z - Y is always branched, but Z just signify that in this point
> tarbals (for rpms...) were released.
icedtea6-1.10 is 2487:9f4eced56544
icedtea6-1.10.3 is 2531:7ba3ed55131e
Why are we telling people to check out an obsolete release? It
doesn't make any sense.
More information about the distro-pkg-dev