[icedtea-web] RFC: Patch to fix PR778
ddadacha at redhat.com
Thu Oct 20 14:23:52 PDT 2011
> Ok for head and 1.1?
It fails to patch in 1.1 because the changeset that implemented the
synchronization of this class was never backported:
Would it be better to backport or to remove the synchronized clauses
from the patch? From reading the email Denis sent out, it looks like
backporting was just never brought up. Perhaps that should be revisited?
More information about the distro-pkg-dev