[rfc][icedtea-web] rewritten xfork test
ptisnovs at redhat.com
Fri Apr 6 08:24:34 PDT 2012
Jiri Vanek wrote:
> Inspired by Omair's effort to reduce failing tests, I have rewritten
> deadlock tests, which were failing quite randomly in half of the cases.
> It was caused by delayed removing of zombies after process have time-outed.
> By this patch, ignorelist which I have proposed two days ago (and will
> do again soon as separate patch) to ignore no-testable classes (eg
> interfaces), and fixes from [RFC][icedtea-web] fixes to reproducer
> engine, we will be on three failing reproducers ("spaces" ) and with
> occasional cache test fill.
> All those five - two sometimes, three regularly - failing reproducers
> are the same issue we are talking in [icedtea-web] RFC: disable tests
> that are known to fail thread. - they are representing issue., but...:)
> 2012-03-22 Jiri Vanek <jvanek at redhat.com>
> Rewritten DeadLockTestTest to stop failing in more then 1/2 of cases
> All assassinated processes were hanging as zombies, killed forcibly by
> kill -9 now.
> (countJavaInstances) now return pids of found javas.
> (killDiff) new method killing zombie javas forcibly.
could you please fix following typos in the test tool?
"This process is hanging more th_e_n"
^ (on more places)
"proces inside background deadlock cant be null. Was."
^ It ^
"lunched JVMs must be exactly 2"
^ (this one is funny :-)
Thank you in advance,
More information about the distro-pkg-dev