If Icedtea-web is the plug-in component for OpenJDK upstream, its name should be openjdk-plugin !
aph at redhat.com
Mon Apr 16 03:40:30 PDT 2012
On 04/16/2012 11:39 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 07:37, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Maybe, but I am worried that calling the plugin package openjdk-plugin
>> would be misleading: the plugin isn't part of OpenJDK. And, you might
>> reply that the user doesn't care; but the stakeholders in OpenJDK (or
>> at least some of them) do care. I'm trying to think of a way around
>> this problem.
> Who in the OpenJDK team would be interested in discussing this?
> Any ideas?
Me. I am, among other things, a member of the OpenJDK Governing
More information about the distro-pkg-dev