[rfc][icedtea-web] rewritten xfork test
ptisnovs at redhat.com
Tue Apr 17 05:46:30 PDT 2012
Jiri Vanek wrote:
> On 04/06/2012 05:24 PM, Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
>> Jiri Vanek wrote:
>>> Inspired by Omair's effort to reduce failing tests, I have rewritten
>>> deadlock tests, which were failing quite randomly in half of the cases.
>>> It was caused by delayed removing of zombies after process have
>>> By this patch, ignorelist which I have proposed two days ago (and will
>>> do again soon as separate patch) to ignore no-testable classes (eg
>>> interfaces), and fixes from [RFC][icedtea-web] fixes to reproducer
>>> engine, we will be on three failing reproducers ("spaces" ) and with
>>> occasional cache test fill.
>>> All those five - two sometimes, three regularly - failing reproducers
>>> are the same issue we are talking in [icedtea-web] RFC: disable tests
>>> that are known to fail thread. - they are representing issue., but...:)
>>> 2012-03-22 Jiri Vanek<jvanek at redhat.com>
>>> Rewritten DeadLockTestTest to stop failing in more then 1/2 of
>>> All assassinated processes were hanging as zombies, killed
>>> forcibly by
>>> kill -9 now.
>>> (countJavaInstances) now return pids of found javas.
>>> (killDiff) new method killing zombie javas forcibly.
>> Hi Jiri,
>> could you please fix following typos in the test tool?
>> "This process is hanging more th_e_n"
>> "...but isnt!"
>> ^ (on more places)
>> "proces inside background deadlock cant be null. Was."
>> ^ It ^
>> "lunched JVMs must be exactly 2"
>> ^ (this one is funny :-)
> Yap. fixed. The changes which were not part of this changeset but were
> noticed will follow as additional changeset.
> Ok now?
> Thanx foe check.
>> Thank you in advance,
your latest changes look ok.
More information about the distro-pkg-dev