icedtea6 1.11 branching on 2012-01-06
Dr Andrew John Hughes
ahughes at redhat.com
Fri Jan 6 09:29:03 PST 2012
On 16:29 Fri 06 Jan , Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 01/06/2012 04:24 PM, Omair Majid wrote:
> > I am trying to figure out what level of shark support should claim to
> > offer in icedtea6 1.11 ("works if the stars are aligned just right" vs
> > "nope, broken").
> None, unless someone wants to do a lot of testing right now. I
> think of this as a temporary withdrawal to be followed by a
> better-than-ever-whiter-than-white-super-duper-new release later
> this year.
Personally, I've not had it working under previous releases, so I
wouldn't even consider it a regression as such. Unless someone is
offering to fix it under a fairly immediate timeframe, we have to
press on with the release in its current state. I don't think it
helps to hold back the release for everyone (and particularly the ARM
port improvements) for a handful of people who are interested in
Shark, most of whom probably work with HEAD anyway.
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/attachments/20120106/c986e2b1/attachment.bin
More information about the distro-pkg-dev