ARM: Support for OpenJDK 7 [resend]
ahughes at redhat.com
Wed Mar 21 04:15:57 PDT 2012
----- Original Message -----
> On 03/21/2012 11:03 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> On 03/20/2012 10:54 AM, Chris Phillips wrote:
> >>> These changes look good and are running well as merged into
> >>> icedtea7-forest-release-2.1
> >>> using the patch set you provided.
> >>> Have "self" built x64, x64-zero and arm-zero w/asm jit with the
> >>> fixes.
> >> Pushed, thanks.
> > Is there a reason the assembly code is called
> > src/cpu/zero/vm/cppInterpreter_arm.S
> > rather than src/cpu/zero/vm/cppInterpreter_arm.s?
> Yes. .S files are source that must be preprocessed.
> > If you did the latter, the divergence
> > in vm.make would be unnecessary.
> > Is there any progress on getting the gcc.make changes upstream?
> I haven't yet had time. I need to collect together everything for
> upstream and start doing builds for up-to-date HotSpot. However,
> Zero doesn't build on up-to-date HotSpot, and I think we should get
> working and then push the fixes. I don't think there's anything to
> gained by pushing fixes to old HotSpot branches upstream.
Ok, I just thought it might be a simple fix which could easily go upstream
and reduce divergence, whereas a larger 'fix Zero' patch would take
longer to review.
I presume the one you want to get in sync with is http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hotspot-main/hotspot/
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
More information about the distro-pkg-dev