Spec updates for getAnnotationsByType and implicit declarations
alex.buckley at oracle.com
Fri Feb 1 11:39:25 PST 2013
On 1/31/2013 6:29 PM, Alex Buckley wrote:
> (It is generally better for the JVMS to provide a space which meets
> the requirements of what a compiler would need to represent a
> language construct, than the JLS saving exactly how to map a language
> construct into a class file.
Typo, meant: ... would need to represent a language construct, rather
than the JLS saying exactly how ...
Also I should have mentioned that, following discussion with Joe, I
renamed isSynthesized() in j.l.r.Parameter to isImplicit(), and bound
the specifications of isImplicit() and isSynthetic() to the same
"explicitly/implicitly declared" concept as in the ClassFile attribute.
More information about the enhanced-metadata-spec-discuss