From mr at sun.com  Wed Nov 28 15:38:32 2007
From: mr at sun.com (Mark Reinhold)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:38:32 -0800
Subject: CFV: Porters Group
Message-ID: <20071128233832.C978B27812D@eggemoggin.niobe.net>

The two-week discussion period for the Porters Group proposal [1]
is now over.

Per the interim governance guidelines for Groups [2] the Interim
Governance Board now has two decisions to make, each by a simple
majority vote:

  (1) Shall this new Group be created?

  (2) If it is created, shall it have the power to grant
      Membership in the OpenJDK Community?

GB members: Please cast your votes in replies to this message.

- Mark


[1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/announce/2007-November/000044.html
[2] http://openjdk.java.net/groups


From mr at sun.com  Wed Nov 28 15:39:15 2007
From: mr at sun.com (Mark Reinhold)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:39:15 -0800
Subject: CFV: Porters Group 
In-Reply-To: mr@sun.com; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:38:32 PST;
	<20071128233832.C978B27812D@eggemoggin.niobe.net> 
Message-ID: <20071128233915.DAA7C27812D@eggemoggin.niobe.net>

> From: Mark Reinhold <mr at sun.com>
> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:38:32 -0800

>   (1) Shall this new Group be created?

Yes.

>   (2) If it is created, shall it have the power to grant
>       Membership in the OpenJDK Community?

Yes.

- Mark


From robilad at yahoo.com  Wed Nov 28 15:42:58 2007
From: robilad at yahoo.com (Dalibor Topic)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:42:58 -0800 (PST)
Subject: CFV: Porters Group
Message-ID: <681544.11676.qm@web51011.mail.re2.yahoo.com>

I vote Yes on both decisions.

cheers,
dalibor topic





      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. 
Make Yahoo! your homepage.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 


From Simon.Phipps at Sun.COM  Wed Nov 28 16:07:53 2007
From: Simon.Phipps at Sun.COM (Simon Phipps)
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:07:53 +0000
Subject: CFV: Porters Group
In-Reply-To: <20071128233832.C978B27812D@eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20071128233832.C978B27812D@eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <76A21E5E-5727-4F4A-8E27-4F7A32992C81@Sun.COM>


On Nov 28, 2007, at 23:38, Mark Reinhold wrote:

> The two-week discussion period for the Porters Group proposal [1]
> is now over.
>
> Per the interim governance guidelines for Groups [2] the Interim
> Governance Board now has two decisions to make, each by a simple
> majority vote:
>
>   (1) Shall this new Group be created?

Yes

>
>   (2) If it is created, shall it have the power to grant
>       Membership in the OpenJDK Community?

Yes

>
> GB members: Please cast your votes in replies to this message.
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/announce/2007-November/ 
> 000044.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/groups

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2494 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/gb-discuss/attachments/20071129/367176a1/attachment.bin 

From dl at cs.oswego.edu  Wed Nov 28 16:10:17 2007
From: dl at cs.oswego.edu (Doug Lea)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:10:17 -0500
Subject: CFV: Porters Group
In-Reply-To: <20071128233832.C978B27812D@eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20071128233832.C978B27812D@eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <474E0369.5020808@cs.oswego.edu>

Mark Reinhold wrote:
> The two-week discussion period for the Porters Group proposal [1]
> is now over.
> 
> Per the interim governance guidelines for Groups [2] the Interim
> Governance Board now has two decisions to make, each by a simple
> majority vote:
> 
>   (1) Shall this new Group be created?
> 

Yes; an obvious omission in retrospect.

>   (2) If it is created, shall it have the power to grant
>       Membership in the OpenJDK Community?
> 

Yes.

-Doug


From fabiane at tridedalo.com.br  Thu Nov 29 03:29:16 2007
From: fabiane at tridedalo.com.br (Fabiane Bizinella Nardon)
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:29:16 -0200
Subject: CFV: Porters Group
In-Reply-To: <20071128233832.C978B27812D@eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20071128233832.C978B27812D@eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <474EA28C.3080302@tridedalo.com.br>


Yes to both.

Fabiane


Mark Reinhold wrote:
> The two-week discussion period for the Porters Group proposal [1]
> is now over.
>
> Per the interim governance guidelines for Groups [2] the Interim
> Governance Board now has two decisions to make, each by a simple
> majority vote:
>
>   (1) Shall this new Group be created?
>
>   (2) If it is created, shall it have the power to grant
>       Membership in the OpenJDK Community?
>
> GB members: Please cast your votes in replies to this message.
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/announce/2007-November/000044.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/groups
>
>
>   


From mr at sun.com  Thu Nov 29 08:55:05 2007
From: mr at sun.com (Mark Reinhold)
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:55:05 -0800
Subject: CFV: Porters Group 
In-Reply-To: mr@sun.com; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:38:32 PST;
	<20071128233832.C978B27812D@eggemoggin.niobe.net> 
Message-ID: <20071129165505.588A427812D@eggemoggin.niobe.net>

> From: Mark Reinhold <mr at sun.com>
> To: gb-discuss at openjdk.java.net

>   (1) Shall this new Group be created?
> 
>   (2) If it is created, shall it have the power to grant
>       Membership in the OpenJDK Community?

Thank you for your prompt votes.

For the record, the GB has voted unanimously in favor of both motions.

- Mark