donald.smith at oracle.com
Wed Feb 1 09:44:41 PST 2012
Coincidentally, this got moved along yesterday and I think it'll just be
a day or two to get it posted.
On 01/02/2012 12:42 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 08:46:56PM -0800, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
>> 2011/11/9 7:13 -0800, mark at klomp.org:
>>> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 12:10 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>>>> While looking at the trademark license I was surprised to find version
>>>> 1.1 at http://openjdk.java.net/legal/openjdk-trademark-notice.html and
>>>> in the actual code repositories. A long time ago there was a proposal
>>>> for a version 1.2 of the trademark license ...
>>> Sorry for digging up this old topic. But it would be nice to get this
>>> cleaned up. Especially since the 1.1 version seems to only mention jdk6
>>> and people are shipping jdk7 variants now.
>> I'll find someone to take care of this.
> Did you find someone?
> I am preparing my Fosdem "Can I legally do that?" talk,
> and the answer for what can be named how kind of depends
> on whether the upgraded trademark license will be made official
> or not. Is there a reason for the delay or is it just that still
> nobody got to it?
More information about the gb-discuss