Missing evaluation on bugs 6914095, 6914113, 6933327, 6935994
vitalyd at gmail.com
Tue Oct 11 09:30:45 PDT 2011
On your last one, have you checked to see if it makes a difference? I
believe using partial registers requires a prefix on the op, making the
instruction larger. Also there are some partial register stalls that can be
On Oct 11, 2011 12:00 PM, "Ulf Zibis" <Ulf.Zibis at gmx.de> wrote:
> some time ago I have submitted these bugs:
> 6914095 <http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6914095> -
> HotSpot should reuse invariant loop parameter
> 6914113 <http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6914113> - Copy
> int to byte in 1 step
> 6933327 <http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6933327> - Use
> shifted addressing modes instead of shift instuctions
> 6935994 <http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6935994> - Use
> as less bits as necessary
> I do not see, why they have been closed as "Will Not Fix".
> Can someone add content to the 'evaluation' section, or at least explain
> reasons here?
> Much thanks,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev