vitalyd at gmail.com
Tue Nov 24 12:13:55 UTC 2015
Right, conceptually it seems it shouldn't be difficult to do that given
this method is intrinsically known to the JVM.
I don't think safepoint poll would need retention either. Given the method
isn't called and is just a pseudo marker for liveness, skipping its
would-be safepoint seems perfectly fine; safepoint poll
placement/optimization should work as-if this method didn't exist at all.
sent from my phone
On Nov 24, 2015 4:39 AM, "Andrew Haley" <aph at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 24/11/15 08:36, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> > AFAIK there are no plans to do such expansion.
> It would be trivial for a back end simply to fail to emit a call.
> We'd still have to emit a safepoint check.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev