RFR (M): 8086053: Address inconsistencies regarding ZeroTLAB
aph at redhat.com
Mon Jan 11 13:31:46 UTC 2016
On 01/11/2016 01:16 PM, Zoltán Majó wrote:
> On 01/09/2016 11:40 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 08/01/16 20:46, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>>> Looks good to me.
>> Maybe we're going to need changes for PPC and AArch64.
> Yes, I think you need this patch on those platforms as well.
>> I'm wondering
>> if maybe we could have some sort of way to flag such changes for
>> maintainers of those ports. Otherwise it's just luck that I notice
>> the bug going past.
> Maybe we could define a new JIRA label for this purpose. What do you
> think about that?
That sounds like it might work.
> Also, we might need a way to signal the need to propagate changes into
> the opposite direction (i.e., from ppc/aarch64 to the other supported
Maybe so. That hasn't happened yet, though. The symmetry appeals to me.
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev