RFR and workflow question

Vladimir Kozlov vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com
Wed Jan 20 16:46:48 UTC 2016

Use 8147475 for commit message - your change can be related (relocation info could be affected by padding).
But I don't see how your change can fix 8146608 - it is patching return PC which is SP relative and nothing to do with 
padding in prolog.

Changes looks fine. Please, integrate it first since it affect all hotspot repos.


On 1/20/16 7:28 AM, Roland Schatz wrote:
> Hi!
> Please review this small bugfix:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rschatz/JDK-8147475/webrev.00/
> This is on top of another webrev[1]. It has no semantic dependency on it, just a random source-level conflict. I can
> rebase them if we want to integrate this one first.
> This is missing a commit message, and I'm not sure what to use here.
> There are two issues that I *think* this will solve, but I can't be sure since I haven't managed to reproduce them:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8147475
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8146608
> Do I just use one of the above issues randomly for the commit message, and close the other as duplicate?
> Thanks,
> Roland
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rschatz/JDK-8147599/webrev.00/

More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev mailing list