review (XS) for 7029509: nightly failures after static fields in Class

Daniel D. Daugherty daniel.daugherty at
Mon Mar 21 12:35:18 PDT 2011

On 3/21/2011 11:38 AM, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
Thumbs up.

    It looks like this fix would be applicable even in the
    absence of moving static fields.

    No comments.

    No comments.


> 7029509: nightly failures after static fields in Class
> Reviewed-by:
> There were a few failures in hotspot-gc after the static fields in
> Classes change.  Two failures are because of missed places where the
> address of static fields were computed.  The third is because only
> real Java klasses have a mirror now so they should be skipped when
> updating the class redefinition statistics.  Tested with nsk hprof,
> heapdump and the nsk/jvmti/scenarios tests.

More information about the hotspot-dev mailing list